Who is Qualified to Work on Apparatus?
By Ben Brown
As the NFPA standards change and the need to prove technician qualification becomes more evident, it is increasingly important to back up your technicians with paperwork. But in discussions with other agencies and technicians, I have run across a few misconceptions.
One of the biggest is that you must be EVT-certified to work on fire apparatus. This is not the case, as the standard states only that you must be qualified to do the repairs that you are performing. The wording from the NFPA 1071 (2006 edition) is “by possession of a recognized certificate, professional standing, or skill, has acquired knowledge, training, and experience and has demonstrated the ability to deal with issues related to the subject matter.” This statement allows for obtained skills and experience that are usually gained on the job.
In the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, a qualified brake technician is merely an individual who has serviced brakes for one year (supervised). These are 2 of the most applicable standards pertaining to technician qualification in fire department shops today. The obvious downfall to blindly accepting on the job experience, or even certification for that matter, is that you must first determine that the individual is performing the repairs correctly and safely.
You must also make sure that they are familiar with the manufacturer requirements for the particular item that they are repairing. Each manufacturer is a little different and what works for one may not work for the rest. The standard also allows for fire departments to send work out for repair but the liability is still on the fire department to prove that the technicians doing the repairs are qualified (even if they don’t work for you).
I suggest that departments start a training/qualification file on all of your techs. As one of my favorite instructors always says “CYA, cover your actions with paper”. This may simply be a written file that states where they performed these types of repairs in the past. It should also include any certifications that they hold and info from any classes that they have attended. It is important to keep track of all of this for future reference. It is equally important to note that a tech who has experience rebuilding engines may not be qualified to do a simple brake job or to tear into a pump. Not recognizing that fact can get you into a lot of trouble liability wise.
As the authority having jurisdiction, you will want to set a minimum standard of qualification for repairs. This starts with determining proficiency and assigning tasks based on that. This may seem like a long and tedious task but it can actually be quick and easy. You don’t have to start from scratch; NFPA standards 1911, 1071 and the FMCSR will help to get you well on your way. These standards do not outline who can perform each specific repair but they do outline some of the big stuff (UL, 3rd party, etc.) These are the 2 largest industry accepted standards and will be referenced if ever an issue is found (in court). The key is developing a standard that fits your needs.
I want end by saying that as far as certifications and certifying agencies go EVT is one of the easiest to deal with and they go out of their way to help get you registered for tests. I personally believe that certification is one of the easiest and fastest ways to prove proficiency in a given area. It is my belief that everybody should attain a level of EVT and ASE certification that corresponds to your job duties.
Ben Brown is a mechanic with the Lisle-Woodridge (Ill.) Fire Department.
